Mike Lynch Extradition – Westminster Magistrates’ Court Delivers Verdict

27 Jul 2021, 43 mins ago

The alleged offences relate to the acquisition of the British tech company, Autonomy, by the US-based Hewlett Packard, headquartered in Palo Alto, California, for USD$11 billion in 2011.

The company was subsequently written down one year later by USD$8.8 billion, at which point Hewlett Packard accused Mr Lynch and the company of fraud, among other offences.

District Judge Snow’s ruling was delivered on Thursday 22 July 2021. This was unexpected, as it was previously assumed that DJ Snow would delay delivering his verdict until Mr Lynch’s civil proceedings in the High Court (which examined the underlying arguments informing the extradition request in much greater detail than in the extradition proceedings) had concluded.

Lynch’s defence team, led by Alex Bailin QC, had previously argued that the forum bar (Section 83A of the Extradition Act 2003) should prevent Mr Lynch from being extradited to the US, as it was supposed that most of the loss or harm resulting from the extradition offences had occurred in the UK, and that it was therefore in the best interests of justice that Mr Lynch be tried for the alleged criminal conduct in the UK.

DJ Snow’s verdict, however, does not mean that Mr Lynch will be extradited imminently. Mr Lynch’s defence team have 14 days from the date of the judgment to appeal the verdict, which in any event will first be sent to the Secretary of State for the Home Department for her approval (or rejection).

If you have any question relating to the published blogs, please do not hesitate to contact us for further advice, send us an e-mail, or alternatively, follow us on Twitter or LinkedIn to stay up-to-date.

The information in this blog is for general information purposes only and does not purport to be comprehensive or to provide legal advice. Whilst every effort is made to ensure the information and law is current as of the date of publication it should be stressed that, due to the passage of time, this does not necessarily reflect the present legal position. Gherson accepts no responsibility for loss which may arise from accessing or reliance on information contained in this blog. For formal advice on the current law please don’t hesitate to contact Gherson. Legal advice is only provided pursuant to a written agreement, identified as such, and signed by the client and by or on behalf of Gherson.

©Gherson 2021