Skip to main content

Alert

Important information for the end of the Brexit Transition Period and the EU Settlement Scheme, if you or your close family members are an EU / EEA Citizen

Contact Us

For advice on immigration,
nationality or human rights,
please contact us now.

Click here to subscribe to weekly updates for our news and blogs.

The Government Is Forced To Pay Out Millions In Compensation To Mistakenly Detained Immigrants

Posted by: Gherson Immigration

It has recently been reported that between 2012 and 2017 the Home Office mistakenly detained over 850 people, some of whom had valid leave to reside in the UK at the time. It is claimed that as a result of this astonishing administrative error the Government had to pay out more than £21 million in compensation.

The above figures were disclosed in a Home Affairs Select Committee paper published this week, which provided a detailed breakdown of the exact number of people wrongfully detained for particular periods and the total sum paid to them in compensation. For example, there were 143 cases of wrongful detention registered between 2016-2017, triggering a £3.3 million compensation payout.

It is also revealed that at least 10 individuals were each paid in excess of £100,000 in compensation, whilst the majority of individuals wrongfully detained received in the region of £20,000 or less. Some only received nominal payments of £1.

The level of compensation was based on the circumstances of each individual case, and was determined by way of an assessment of the “initial shock” caused to the person wrongfully detained. The level of compensation also took into account whether the individual had any previous criminal convictions. Payouts were also made to people who were detained legally, because they had no right to remain in the UK, but whose detention was considered to have been too long.

Although the figures published by the Home Affairs Select Committee do not give details of names or nationalities of the people who were mistakenly detained in immigration detention centers ahead of deportation, it is claimed that it is likely that some of them were Windrush individuals.

The Home Office tried to play down the significance of the numbers of mistakenly detained immigrants claiming that by comparison, this was just a small proportion of the total number of immigrants detained in the UK. The Home Office also stated that “Ninety-five per cent of people who are liable to removal are managed in the community, rather than in detention”. However, Stephen Doughty MP (Labour) who sits on the Home Affairs Committee, said “These figures expose what many of us have warned for months: that the government has been wrongfully locking up individuals as well as wrongfully deporting others. The immigration system needs root and branch reform. How are millions of EU nationals to have any confidence in a system that wrongly deports and locks up people?”

Intriguingly, the same document also disclosed that the Home Office operated targets and bonus schemes for enforced removals from the UK, which applied to senior and junior caseworkers. Some employees even had to meet personal targets on which bonus payments were made. The Home Office admitted that civil servants working within immigration enforcement received performance bonuses for good work, some of which was related to removals.

Only relatively recently, in April this year, confusion over removals targets led to the resignation of the previous Home Secretary, Amber Rudd, when she claimed “that’s not how we operate” but later admitted that she “wasn’t aware of specific removal targets”. The new Home Secretary, Sajid Javid, has said that he intended to stop the operation of targets, stating that he did “not believe in quantifying targets for removals”.

 

The information in this blog is for general information purposes only and does not purport to be comprehensive or to provide legal advice. Whilst every effort is made to ensure the information and law is current as of the date of publication it should be stressed that, due to the passage of time, this does not necessarily reflect the present legal position. Gherson accepts no responsibility for loss which may arise from accessing or reliance on information contained in this blog. For formal advice on the current law please don’t hesitate to contact Gherson. Legal advice is only provided pursuant to a written agreement, identified as such, and signed by the client and by or on behalf of Gherson.

©Gherson 2018

Contact Us

For advice on immigration, nationality, extradition or human rights, please contact us now.

Contact Us