From June 2018 – June 2019, the Home Office granted protection – in the form of asylum, humanitarian protection and alternative forms of leave and resettlement – to some 18,519 people, out of a total of 32,693 asylum applications lodged during that period. According to Government statistics, from the asylum applications with known outcomes for 2015 – 2017, 35% were granted whilst 65% were refused. 71% of applicants who received negative decisions thereafter pursued appeals, with 40% of appellants having their appeals allowed and 53% of successful appellants thereafter receiving a favourable decision and a grant of asylum.
The Home Secretary is reportedly on a quest to curb asylum seekers’ right to appeal negative asylum decisions in a bid to slash the number of “vexatious” claims which are deemed to be “without merit” and which are perceived to be clogging up the court system.
The Minister for Immigration Compliance and the Courts, Chris Phillip, announced that the Ministry of Justice will raise the bar for appeals so they will only be allowed if there is an “exceptional public interest”. The Ministry has not yet divulged what is meant by “exceptional public interest” and how this will raise the threshold for leave to appeal. In fact, Ministers seem to be frustrated by the number of legal appeals preventing the removal of appellants and have therefore decided to speed up the removal process. According to the Ministry of Justice, claims which are “without merit” can often find their way to the Court of Appeal.
Furthermore, it is expected that the Ministry of Justice will seek to raise the bar for foreign criminals and people simultaneously fighting extradition requests who lodge asylum claims in order to avoid deportation. It is understood that a Bill is to be introduced in Parliament early in the New Year, which will aim to force judges to place more weight on the individual’s criminal record and charges. Non-criminal claimants will also see their chances of being granted asylum diminish. They will have to submit all their arguments for asylum status at the beginning of the case, which will ultimately give them less time to mount a credible case.
In her speech at the Conservative Party conference, the Home Secretary correctly highlighted the fact that the current asylum system was not working, and certainly not for those stranded in the process itself. Among the number of people claiming asylum in the UK are many who are highly qualified and skilled and who could contribute meaningfully to the economy. Instead, since the law was last amended in 2002, asylum seekers have been prevented from taking up employment. Such a policy is counterproductive and fiscally irresponsible, ultimately costing the taxpayer and missing out on potential economic growth.
Join Gherson’s mailing lists to stay connected with the latest on this story or alternatively follow us on Twitter or LinkedIn
The information in this blog is for general information purposes only and does not purport to be comprehensive or to provide legal advice. Whilst every effort is made to ensure the information and law is current as of the date of publication it should be stressed that, due to the passage of time, this does not necessarily reflect the present legal position. Gherson accepts no responsibility for loss which may arise from accessing or reliance on information contained in this blog. For formal advice on the current law please don’t hesitate to contact Gherson. Legal advice is only provided pursuant to a written agreement, identified as such, and signed by the client and by or on behalf of Gherson.
©Gherson 2020