Gherson - Visa Services

Re-entry bans - government announces further major concession

Gherson — Thu, 15 May 2008 00:00:00 -0700

The history of the Border and Immigration Agency’s, (recently renamed the “UK Borders Agency” or UKBA) implementation of its points based system via the immigration rules is bizarre to say the least. HC 321 was laid before Parliament on 6 February of this year. In this "statement of changes in the immigration rules" the government - without any prior warning or consultation - introduced rules which were immediately characterised as “re-entry bans”.

Employers and Sponsor Licensing - severe consequences of refusal / revocation

Gherson — Tue, 6 May 2008 00:00:00 -0700

On 29 February 2008 the UK Border Agency opened the Register of Licensed Sponsors to employers wishing to issue Certificates of Sponsorship to migrants.

Certificates of Sponsorship will replace the current work permit system in its entirety when Tier 2 of the Points Based System goes live. The Agency currently anticipates that this will be in Autumn 2008. Employers who do not appear on the register will not be able to sponsor migrant workers.

Child Visitors - Requirement to name all those who may travel with a child. Failure to do so may result in child being refused entry to the UK.

Gherson — Tue, 6 May 2008 00:00:00 -0700

On 12 February 2006 the Border and Immigration Agency (now the UK Border Agency) introduced a new requirement into the Immigration Rules relating to child visitors. (Paragraph 46A of the Immigration Rules).

The Rule requires in relation to visa nationals that if a child applies for an Entry Clearance (a visa) as an accompanied child, they must specify which parent or guardian will travel with them. As a consequence, the Home Office may interpret this as meaning that on each entry to the UK the child must be accompanied by the parent or guardian specified on their Entry Clearance. The child could be refused entry to the UK if they are not travelling with the person specified.

No appeal by government from HSMP success in Administrative Court

Gherson — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 05:04:19 -0700

In a judgment handed down on 8 April 2008 Sir George Newman granted the HSMP Forum’s application for a declaration that the Secretary of State had unlawfully applied the changed provisions of the Highly Skilled Migrant Scheme to people who had entered the United Kingdom under the previous requirements of the scheme. The judge found that due to the terms of the guidance provided to the applicants when they entered the UK under the HSMP they had legitimately expected that their applications to extend their stay in the UK would be considered under the same criteria which had applied when they had been granted leave to enter. His crucial conclusion was:

Points based system - special time limited arrangements for people already in the UK

Gherson — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0700

In the most recent measure announced with respect to its Points Based System the UK Border Agency has announced that people currently in the United Kingdom in specific immigration categories which will be deleted as the Points Based System is implemented may complete their leave to remain under the existing terms of that leave. If they apply successfully to extend their leave in their existing categories they will be granted enough further leave to remain to entitle them to apply for settlement in the UK at the expiry of that further leave to remain.

New entry clearance guidance notes cover concession of 17 March 2008

Gherson and Co — Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0700

The new unified UK Borders Agency (which yesterday - 3 April 2008 - brought together Border, immigration, customs and visa checks) has updated its guidance to entry clearance officers to include both the new general grounds for refusal and the Secretary of State ’s concession announced in the House of Lords on 17 March 2008.

Concession re no return rule - advice is essential

Gherson — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:00 -0700

Last week the Secretary of State, via her representative Lord Bassam of Brighton in the House of Lords, made an important concession regarding the scope of the general grounds for refusal contained in the recent statement of changes in the immigration rules, HC 321.

No return rule - those in UK now not affected if they go home before October

Gherson — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:00:00 -0700

The government’s most recent statement of changes in the immigration rules – HC 321 – implemented the Tier one (general) sub category of the new Points Based System. As was reported here on 14 February 2008 – the statement includes new “general grounds for refusal” which – at rule 320 (7B) - have the effect of requiring entry clearance officers to refuse any application from someone who has overstayed any previous leave to remain or who has previously entered the UK illegally, or who has used deception in any previous application for entry clearance. All applications are to be refused for a period of one year, but if the applicant returned to his or her home country voluntarily but at the UK’s expense all future applications will be refused for a period of five years after the person’s departure from the UK. If he or she was removed or deported - all applications will be refused for a period of ten years after the removal or deportation. People who used deception will always have to wait ten years before any future application will be not automatically be refused. The statement of changes indicated that these penalties will be applied from April 1 2008 – giving anyone affected by them effectively no time at all to return home and to make an application for entry clearance under the rules as they are at the moment.

Third party can provide accommodation for spouse

Gherson — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:55:27 -0700

Back in June of last year we reported the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal’s determination in AM (3rd party support not permitted R281 (v)) Ethiopia [2007] UKAIT 00058. In that case the Tribunal - chaired by its current president - found that people applying for entry clearance under rule 281 of the Immigration Rules had to show that they could maintain themselves from their own means – and that the wording of the rule prohibited them from relying on funds received from other people (known as “third parties”). In December we reported the Court of Appeal’s judgment in MW (Liberia) v Secretary of State [2007] EWCA Civ 1376, in which the Court of Appeal upheld the Tribunal’s determination dismissing the appeal of a child against the refusal of her application to join her mother in UK – finding that children applying to come to the UK could only rely upon funds for their maintenance which were provided by their parents.

Green Paper : citizenship changes - all existing immigration laws to go

Gherson — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 05:30:00 -0800

The government has this month issued a new green paper setting out further major changes to the United Kingdom’s system of immigration. The changes will be set out in a draft bill in the summer. This will be followed in November of this year by a single piece of legislation which, according to the Border and Immigration Agency will “replace all existing immigration laws”. The proposals are apparently the consequence of several months of public listening sessions carried out by the Central Office for Information. In December of last year the Immigration Minister Liam Byrne was quoted as stating that (happily) this consultation programme had revealed that the UK was not a nation of “Alf Garnetts”.